Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Bird Communities of Prairie Uplands and Wetlands in Relation to Farming Practices in Saskatchewan

Dave Shutler, Adele Mullie and Robert G. Clark
Conservation Biology
Vol. 14, No. 5 (Oct., 2000), pp. 1441-1451
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2641797
Page Count: 11
  • Get Access
  • Download ($42.00)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Bird Communities of Prairie Uplands and Wetlands in Relation to Farming Practices in Saskatchewan
Preview not available

Abstract

Modern farm practices can vary in their emphasis on tillage versus chemicals to control weeds, and researchers know little about which emphasis has greater ecological benefits. We compared avifaunas of uplands and wetlands in four treatments: conventional farms, conservation farms (contrasting those that minimized frequency of tillage [minimum tillage] with those that eliminated chemical inputs [organic]), and restored or natural (wild) sites in Saskatchewan, Canada. Of 37 different upland bird species encountered during surveys, one made greater use of farms, four made greater use of wild sites, and the remaining species showed no preference. When all upland species were combined, higher relative abundance occurred on wild than on farm sites, and on minimum tillage than on conventional farms. Wild upland sites also had more species than did conventional farms. Of 79 different species encountered during surveys of wetlands and their margins, most had similar encounter probabilities among treatments, although seven were more common on either organic farms or wild sites. Higher relative abundances were documented in wetland habitat of wild sites and organic farms than of minimum tillage or conventional farms. Wetlands of wild sites had more species than did minimum tillage or conventional farms. Overall, in terms of both avifaunal density and diversity, small treatment effects could be ascribed to differences between conventional and conservation farms, whereas larger effects were due to differences between farms and wild sites. Wetlands were heavily used by birds in all treatments, suggesting high conservation priority regardless of context.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1441
    1441
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1442
    1442
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1443
    1443
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1444
    1444
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1445
    1445
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1446
    1446
  • Thumbnail: Page 
[1447]
    [1447]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1448
    1448
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1449
    1449
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1450
    1450
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1451
    1451