You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Small-Sample Confidence Intervals for Impulse Response Functions
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Vol. 80, No. 2 (May, 1998), pp. 218-230
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2646633
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Musical intervals, Estimation bias, Region of integration, Vector autoregression, Estimators, Confidence interval, Simulations, Sampling bias, Statistical estimation, Population estimates
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Bias-corrected bootstrap confidence intervals explicitly account for the bias and skewness of the small-sample distribution of the impulse response estimator, while retaining asymptotic validity in stationary autoregressions. Monte Carlo simulations for a wide range of bivariate models show that in small samples bias-corrected bootstrap intervals tend to be more accurate than delta method intervals, standard bootstrap intervals, and Monte Carlo integration intervals. This conclusion holds for VAR models estimated in levels, as deviations from a linear time trend, and in first differences. It also holds for random walk processes and cointegrated processes estimated in levels. An empirical example shows that bias-corrected bootstrap intervals may imply economic interpretations of the data that are substantively different from standard methods.
The Review of Economics and Statistics © 1998 The MIT Press