Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Estimating the Contributions of Population Density and Climatic Fluctuations to Interannual Variation in Survival of Soay Sheep

J. M. Milner, D. A. Elston and S. D. Albon
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 68, No. 6 (Nov., 1999), pp. 1235-1247
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2647207
Page Count: 13
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($18.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Estimating the Contributions of Population Density and Climatic Fluctuations to Interannual Variation in Survival of Soay Sheep
Preview not available

Abstract

1. The relative importance of density-dependent and -independent factors on interannual variation in over-winter survival was investigated in the fluctuating population of Soay sheep on St Kilda, Scotland, over the period 1985-96. 2. Population density had a negative effect on survival in lambs and adult males while adult female survival showed no evidence of density dependence over the observed range of population densities. 3. Climatic fluctuations associated with the winter North Atlantic oscillation index (NAO) also affected survival, which decreased in winters that were relatively warm, wet and windy. The effect was most pronounced in lambs. 4. Survival was modelled using logistic regression analysis with and without year fitted as a random effect. The former incorporated stochastic year to year variation in survival. Results from the two modelling approaches were similar in terms of the regression coefficients estimated. However, the standard errors of the year-dependent covariates, population size and NAO, were underestimated when the random year effect was ignored, leading to incorrect inferences about the relative significance of terms being made. 5. Using both modelling approaches, density dependence was found to have a greater influence on survival than the effect of NAO in lambs and adult males, whereas in adult females NAO was the more important. 6. Once random between-year effects were taken into account, the individually varying terms such as body weight and faecal egg count were the most significant factors explaining differences in survival.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[1235]
    [1235]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1236
    1236
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1237
    1237
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1238
    1238
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1239
    1239
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1240
    1240
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1241
    1241
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1242
    1242
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1243
    1243
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1244
    1244
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1245
    1245
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1246
    1246
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1247
    1247