You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Explaining the Latitudinal Gradient Anomaly in Ichneumonid Species Richness: Evidence from Butterflies
Karen R. Sime and Andrew V. Z. Brower
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 67, No. 3 (May, 1998), pp. 387-399
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2647379
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. Despite the profusion of Lepidoptera and other potential hosts in the tropics, the Ichneumonidae are not more species-rich in the lowland tropics than in temperate communities. Alternate but partially complementary hypotheses emphasizing resource fragmentation, predation, or chemical defence have been proposed to explain this paradox. 2. Because different diversity gradients occur in the various subgroups of the Ichneumonidae, as well as among their hosts, general explanations are unlikely to account for this `anomalous diversity.' Hypotheses of ecological causation are best tested at the taxonomic level where the pattern of interest applies. 3. Phylogenetic trends in the distribution, abundance, and palatability of butterflies (Papilionoidea), a group that increases dramatically in species richness towards the tropics, are presented as a case study for evaluating hypotheses of parasitoid species richness. Evidence is presented that supports the `nasty host hypothesis' as an explanation for the lack of diversity of associated parasitoids. 4. An examination of hypotheses and the approaches used to test them suggests that the nasty-host hypothesis is best supported by the limited evidence available, while evidence in favour of other hypotheses is either lacking or ambiguous. In particular, use of the koinobiont/idiobiont dichotomy and parasitoid assemblage-size comparisons may result in contradictory conclusions.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1998 British Ecological Society