You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Journal of Politics
Vol. 60, No. 1 (Feb., 1998), pp. 174-187
Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of the Southern Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2648006
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Rousseau is one of the greatest of modern writers to strike a "Socratic" stance, thus forging a link between his own project and that of the founder of political philosophy. In the Discourse on the Sciences and Arts, the work that established his reputation, Rousseau appeals to Plato's Apology and Socrates' alleged defense of virtue-"the sublime science of simple souls"-against the pretensions of "Enlightenment" Upon examination, however, Rousseau's endorsement of Socrates proves so ambiguous as to imply the replacement of the Platonic version by a Rousseauan one Rousseau's presentation of the role of the philosopher in society is at the same time more "populist" and more "elitist" than that of Plato It is more populist in its vindication of "ignorance" as the basis of virtue and more elitist in its suggestion that even the defense of ignorance must rest with an avant-garde of philosophers.
The Journal of Politics © 1998 The University of Chicago Press