You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs, 1998
Rene Almeling, Laureen Tews and Susan Dudley
Family Planning Perspectives
Vol. 32, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 2000), pp. 268-271+320
Published by: Guttmacher Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2648194
Page Count: 5
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Context: Since the late 1970s, the number of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs providing abortion training in the United States has steadily decreased. Given the documented shortage of abortion providers, assessing and ensuring the availability of abortion training in graduate medical education is critical. Methods: In 1998, the National Abortion Federation surveyed the 261 accredited U.S. residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology, and analyzed the availability of first- and second-trimester abortion training. Results: Of the 179 programs that responded to the survey, 81% reported that they offer first-trimester abortion training-46% routinely and 34% as an elective. Seventy-four percent of programs offer second-trimester training-44% routinely and 29% as an elective. Some programs that do not offer training give residents the option of obtaining it elsewhere. While 26% of programs indicated that all residents in their programs receive abortion training, 40% said that fewer than half are trained, including 14% that train no residents. The operating room is the most common training site: Fifty-nine percent of programs reported that abortion training takes place in the operating room. Conclusions: After a decades-long decline in the availability of abortion training, opportunities for abortion training have increased. However, there is reason to be cautious in interpreting these results, including possible response bias and pressure to report the availability of abortion training because of new guidelines from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
Family Planning Perspectives © 2000 Guttmacher Institute