You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Self-Assessment and Peer Review: Improving Indonesian Service Providers' Communication with Clients
Young Mi Kim, Fitri Putjuk, Endang Basuki and Adrienne Kols
International Family Planning Perspectives
Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar., 2000), pp. 4-12
Published by: Guttmacher Institute
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2648283
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Peer review, Family planning, Communication facilities, Training, Control groups, Learning, Statistical significance, News content, Total communication, Meetings
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Context: Training alone may not be sufficient to prompt complex and lasting changes in the performance of family planning providers. Affordable and effective reinforcement mechanisms are needed to ensure that providers apply new skills on the job. Methods: In December 1997 and January 1998, 201 providers working at 170 clinics in Indonesia attended a training course on client-centered counseling. They were divided into three subgroups for follow-up. One group (controls) received no reinforcement, one conducted weekly self-assessments and the third attended peer-review meetings in addition to conducting self-assessments. Data were collected before training, immediately afterward and after four months of reinforcement to measure changes in provider and client behavior. Results: In the month after training, counseling sessions were about twice as long as before, and providers offered twice as much information and counseling on medical and family planning issues. The frequency of providers' facilitative communication (which fosters rapport and client participation) doubled from 15 to 30 instances per session, and the number of clients' questions increased from 1.6 to 3.3. After reinforcement, providers' facilitative communication, clients' active communication and clients' ratings of self-expression and satisfaction increased in the self-assessment group, but did not change significantly in the control group. Both providers' facilitative communication and clients' active communication improved further in the peer-review group, but this intervention did not affect clients' perspectives on the counseling experience. Conclusions: Self-assessment and peer review help maintain providers' performance after training and prompt continuous quality improvement.
International Family Planning Perspectives © 2000 Guttmacher Institute