You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta
Thomas M. Crisp and Ted A. Warfield
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Vol. 61, No. 1 (Jul., 2000), pp. 173-184
Published by: International Phenomenological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2653408
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of the Consequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument's central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research © 2000 International Phenomenological Society