Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta

Thomas M. Crisp and Ted A. Warfield
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Vol. 61, No. 1 (Jul., 2000), pp. 173-184
DOI: 10.2307/2653408
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2653408
Page Count: 12
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta
Preview not available

Abstract

Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of the Consequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument's central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
173
    173
  • Thumbnail: Page 
174
    174
  • Thumbnail: Page 
175
    175
  • Thumbnail: Page 
176
    176
  • Thumbnail: Page 
177
    177
  • Thumbnail: Page 
178
    178
  • Thumbnail: Page 
179
    179
  • Thumbnail: Page 
180
    180
  • Thumbnail: Page 
181
    181
  • Thumbnail: Page 
182
    182
  • Thumbnail: Page 
183
    183
  • Thumbnail: Page 
184
    184