You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Reply to Lynne Rudder Baker
Eric T. Olson
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
Vol. 59, No. 1 (Mar., 1999), pp. 161-166
Published by: International Phenomenological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2653463
Page Count: 6
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In "Was I Ever a Fetus?" I argued that, since each of us was once an unthinking fetus, psychological continuity cannot be necessary for us to persist through time. Baker claims that the argument is invalid, and that both the premise and the conclusion are false. I attempt to defend argument, premise, and conclusion against her objections.
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research © 1999 International Phenomenological Society