You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Tools for Intuition about Sample Selection Bias and Its Correction
Ross M. Stolzenberg and Daniel A. Relles
American Sociological Review
Vol. 62, No. 3 (Jun., 1997), pp. 494-507
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657318
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
We provide mathematical tools to assist intuition about selection bias in concrete empirical analyses. These new tools do not offer a general solution to the selection bias problem; no method now does that. Rather, the techniques we present offer a new decomposition of selection bias. This decomposition permits an analyst to develop intuition and make reasoned judgments about the sources, severity, and direction of sample selection bias in a particular analysis. When combined with simulation results, also presented in this paper, our decomposition of bias also permits a reasoned, empirically-informed judgment of when the well-known two-step estimator of Heckman (1976, 1979) is likely to increase or decrease the accuracy of regression coefficient estimates. We also use simulations to confirm mathematical derivations.
American Sociological Review © 1997 American Sociological Association