You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reported Religious Attendance
Stanley Presser and Linda Stinson
American Sociological Review
Vol. 63, No. 1 (Feb., 1998), pp. 137-145
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657486
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Age, Response rates, Social desirability, Self reports, School surveys, Social biases, Demography, Public opinion, Sociology of religion, High schools
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Compared to conventional interviewer-administered questions about attendance at religious services, self-administered items and time-use items should minimize social desirability pressures. In fact, they each reduce claims of weekly religious attendance by about one-third. This difference in measurement approach does not generally affect associations between attendance and demographic characteristics. It does, however, alter the observed trend in religious attendance over time: In contrast to the almost constant attendance rate recorded by conventional interviewer-administered items, approaches minimizing social desirability bias reveal that weekly attendance has declined continuously over the past three decades. These results provide support for the hypothesis that America has become more secularized, and they demonstrate the role of mode of administration in reducing measurement error.
American Sociological Review © 1998 American Sociological Association