You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
A Refutation of the Doomsday Argument
Kevin B. Korb and Jonathan J. Oliver
Vol. 107, No. 426 (Apr., 1998), pp. 403-410
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2659883
Page Count: 8
Preview not available
Carter and Leslie's Doomsday Argument maintains that reflection upon the number of humans born thus far, when that number is viewed as having been uniformly randomly selected from amongst all humans, past, present and future, leads to a dramatic rise in the probability of an early end to the human experiment. We examine the Bayesian structure of the Argument and find that the drama is largely due to its oversimplification.
Mind © 1998 Oxford University Press