You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Relationship between Serial Monogamy and Rape in the United States (1960-1995)
Philip T. Starks and Caroline A. Blackie
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 267, No. 1449 (Jun. 22, 2000), pp. 1259-1263
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2665723
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Rape, Divorce rates, Monogamy, Statistical variance, Female animals, Divorce, Reproduction, Remarriage, Pregnancy, Women
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In mating systems where individuals pair, separate and re-pair repeatedly (i.e. serial monogamy), some males monopolize more than one female's reproductive life span and thus leave other males effectively mateless. Males who cannot secure females through traditional methods may seek alternatives, such as rape, to ensure gene passage into future generations. Analysis of US government records shows that (i) divorce and remarriage patterns in the United States are likely to increase the variance in male reproductive success, and (ii) rates of divorce and rape correlate positively. The former result suggests that serial monogamy increases the variance in male, relative to female, reproductive success and the latter result suggests that this variance influences the frequency of rape in American society. Because raped females sometimes become pregnant and take these pregnancies to term, our results indicate that rape has current adaptive significance.
Proceedings: Biological Sciences © 2000 Royal Society