You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Relationships between Root Density of the African Grass Hyparrhenia diplandra and Nitrification at the Decimetric Scale: An Inhibition- Stimulation Balance Hypothesis
Jean-Christophe Lata, Karine Guillaume, Valerie Degrange, Luc Abbadie and Robert Lensi
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 267, No. 1443 (Mar. 22, 2000), pp. 595-600
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2665981
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Nitrification, Savanna soils, Acid soils, Forest soils, Savannas, Soil depth, Clay soils, Grasses, Soil ecology, Soil samples
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Previous studies have shown that Lamto savannah exhibits two different types of nitrogen cycle with high and low nitrification sites and suggested that the perennial grass Hyparrhenia diplandra is responsible for this duality at a subpopulation level, with one ecotype being thought to be able to inhibit nitrification. The present work aimed to investigate the relationships between nitrification and the roots of H. diplandra at two scales. (i) Site-scale experiments gave new insight into the hypothesized control of nitrification by H. diplandra tussocks: the two ecotypes exhibited opposite influences, inhibition in a low nitrification site (A) and stimulation in a high nitrification site (B). (ii) Decimetric-scale experiments demonstrated close negative or positive relationships (in sites A or B, respectively) between the roots and nitrification (in the 0-10 cm soil layer), showing an unexpectedly high sensitivity of the nitrification process to root density. In both soils, the correlation between the roots and nitrification decreased with depth and practically disappeared in the 20-30 cm soil layer (where the nitrification potential was found to be very low). Therefore, the impact of H. diplandra on nitrification may be viewed as an inhibition-stimulation balance.
Proceedings: Biological Sciences © 2000 Royal Society