You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting
James M. Snyder, Jr. and Tim Groseclose
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 44, No. 2 (Apr., 2000), pp. 193-211
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2669305
Page Count: 19
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Voting, Political parties, Congressional voting, Point estimators, Legislators, Upper houses, Political science, Statistical significance, Political partisanship, Instrumental variables estimation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article develops and implements a simple procedure to estimate the extent to which party influences roll-call voting in the U.S. Congress. We find strong evidence of party influence in both the House and the Senate, in virtually all congresses over the period 1871-1998. We do not find any large, systematic differences in influence between the House and Senate. Over the post-war period, party influence in the House occurs especially often on key procedural votes-the rule on a bill, motions to cut off debate, and motions to recommit. In terms of substantive issues, party influence appears most frequently on budget resolutions, tax policy, social security, social welfare policy, and the national debt limit, while it is relatively rare on moral and religious issues and civil rights, and entirely absent on issues such as gun control. On some issues, such as agriculture, public works, and nuclear energy, party influence has varied dramatically over the period we study.
American Journal of Political Science © 2000 Midwest Political Science Association