You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Duration Models and Proportional Hazards in Political Science
Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier and Christopher J. W. Zorn
American Journal of Political Science
Vol. 45, No. 4 (Oct., 2001), pp. 972-988
Published by: Midwest Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2669335
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Economic growth models, Political science, Parametric models, Statistical models, Dyadic relations, Modeling, Alliances, Democracy, Peacetime, Economic models
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A key assumption of nearly all widely used duration models is that the hazard ratios (i.e., the conditional relative risks across substrata) are proportional to one another and that this proportionality is maintained over time. Estimation of proportional hazards models when hazards are non-proportional results in coefficient biases and decreased power of significance tests. Techniques for relaxing this assumption allow scholars to test whether the effects of covariates change over time and also permit a more nuanced understanding of the phenomenon being studied. We address the potential problems with incorrectly assuming proportionality, illustrate a number of tests for non-proportionality, and conclude with a discussion of how to accurately and efficiently estimate these models in the presence of nonproportional hazards. We investigate the proportionality assumption for Cox's semiparametric model in the context of the "liberal peace" debate, using data on international conflict in the postwar period.
American Journal of Political Science © 2001 Midwest Political Science Association