Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Analysis of Nitrogen Cycling in a Forest Stream during Autumn Using a 15N-Tracer Addition

Jennifer L. Tank, Judy L. Meyer, Diane M. Sanzone, Patrick J. Mulholland, Jackson R. Webster, Bruce J. Peterson, Wilfred M. Wollheim and Norman E. Leonard
Limnology and Oceanography
Vol. 45, No. 5 (Jul., 2000), pp. 1013-1029
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2670693
Page Count: 17
  • More info
  • Cite this Item
Analysis of Nitrogen Cycling in a Forest Stream during Autumn Using a 15N-Tracer Addition
Preview not available

Abstract

We added 15NH4Cl over 6 weeks to Upper Ball Creek, a second-order deciduous forest stream in the Appalachian Mountains, to follow the uptake, spiraling, and fate of nitrogen in a stream food web during autumn. A priori predictions of N flow and retention were made using a simple food web mass balance model. Values of δ15N were determined for stream water ammonium, nitrate, dissolved organic nitrogen, and various compartments of the food web over time and distance and then compared to model predictions. Ammonium uptake lengths were shortest at the beginning of the tracer addition (28 m) and increased through time (day 20 = 82 m, day 41 = 94 m), and ammonium residence time in stream water ranged from 4 min on day 0 to 15 min on day 41. Whole-stream ammonium uptake rates, determined from the decline in 15NH4 in water over the stream reach, decreased from 191 mg N m-2 d-1 on day 0 to 83.2 mg N m-2 d-2 on day 41. Temporal trends in the NH4 mass transfer coefficient (vf) were similar to uptake rates; vf was highest on day 0 (7.4 × 10-4 m s-1) and lower on days 20 and 41 (2.7 and 2.8 × 10-4 m s-1, respectively). Rates of nitrification were estimated to be very low throughout the tracer addition and accounted for $<3\%$ of 15NH4 uptake on day 0. It appears that most of the N in epilithon was actively cycling based on comparisons of 15NH in stream water and biomass at the end of the experiment. In contrast, for allochthonous organic matter, we found that microbial 15NH represented 69% of the label in wood, 20% in leaves, and 31% in fine benthic organic matter (FBOM). Despite higher δ15N values in primary producers, 15NH4 uptake rates per unit stream bottom area were generally lower in epilithon compared to the detrital compartments, a result of the lower biomass of epilithon. Turnover times were similar for epilithon (47 d), leaves (38 d), and FBOM (53 d) based on the decline in 15NH tracer over the first 28 d after the addition stopped. Incorporation of 15NH varied among biomass compartments involved in ammonium uptake from water. Primary producers were more highly labeled than allochthonous organic matter. Epilithon δ15NH values were higher than leaves or FBOM, appeared to reach isotopic equilibrium by day 42, and followed model-predicted trends. The grazing mayfly Stenonema was more highly labeled than the epilithon, which suggests selective feeding or assimilation of the more highly labeled algal-bacterial portion of the epilithon. Leaves had very low δ15NH values, and δ15NH values for the shredding stonefly Tallaperla were close to model predictions and followed labeling in leaves. Total retention of 15NH at the end of the experiment by the nine largest biomass compartments within the study reach accounted for only 12.3% of added 15NH, with leaves and FBOM representing the largest portions. Export of 15NH by suspended particulate and dissolved N accounted for an additional 11% and 30% of added 15NH, respectively. Results from the 15NH-tracer addition in Upper Ball Creek demonstrate the high ammonium demand associated with microbes colonizing leaf detritus and the resultant linkage to invertebrate shredders. In Upper Ball Creek in autumn, spiraling of NH4 is very tight, NH4 residence time in water is short, and uptake rates are very high. Analyses of N spiraling in unimpacted streams provide an ecological foundation for assessment of spiraling in high-N streams.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1013
    1013
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1014
    1014
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1015
    1015
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1016
    1016
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1017
    1017
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1018
    1018
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1019
    1019
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1020
    1020
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1021
    1021
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1022
    1022
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1023
    1023
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1024
    1024
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1025
    1025
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1026
    1026
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1027
    1027
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1028
    1028
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1029
    1029