Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Prior Induction in Log-Linear Models for General Contingency Table Analysis

R. King and S. P. Brooks
The Annals of Statistics
Vol. 29, No. 3 (Jun., 2001), pp. 715-747
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2673969
Page Count: 33
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($19.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Prior Induction in Log-Linear Models for General Contingency Table Analysis
Preview not available

Abstract

Log-linear modelling plays an important role in many statistical applications, particularly in the analysis of contingency table data. With the advent of powerful new computational techniques such as reversible jump MCMC, Bayesian analyses of these models, and in particular model selection and averaging, have become feasible. Coupled with this is the desire to construct and use suitably flexible prior structures which allow efficient computation while facilitating prior elicitation. The latter is greatly improved in the case where priors can be specified on interpretable parameters about which relevant experts can express their beliefs. In this paper, we show how the specification of a general multivariate normal prior on the log-linear parameters induces a multivariate log-normal prior on the corresponding cell counts of a contingency table. We derive the parameters of this distribution in an explicit practical form and state the corresponding mean and covariances of the cell counts. We discuss the importance of these results in terms of applying both uninformative and informative priors to the model parameters and provide an illustration in the context of the analysis of a 23 contingency table.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
715
    715
  • Thumbnail: Page 
716
    716
  • Thumbnail: Page 
717
    717
  • Thumbnail: Page 
718
    718
  • Thumbnail: Page 
719
    719
  • Thumbnail: Page 
720
    720
  • Thumbnail: Page 
721
    721
  • Thumbnail: Page 
722
    722
  • Thumbnail: Page 
723
    723
  • Thumbnail: Page 
724
    724
  • Thumbnail: Page 
725
    725
  • Thumbnail: Page 
726
    726
  • Thumbnail: Page 
727
    727
  • Thumbnail: Page 
728
    728
  • Thumbnail: Page 
729
    729
  • Thumbnail: Page 
730
    730
  • Thumbnail: Page 
731
    731
  • Thumbnail: Page 
732
    732
  • Thumbnail: Page 
733
    733
  • Thumbnail: Page 
734
    734
  • Thumbnail: Page 
735
    735
  • Thumbnail: Page 
736
    736
  • Thumbnail: Page 
737
    737
  • Thumbnail: Page 
738
    738
  • Thumbnail: Page 
739
    739
  • Thumbnail: Page 
740
    740
  • Thumbnail: Page 
741
    741
  • Thumbnail: Page 
742
    742
  • Thumbnail: Page 
743
    743
  • Thumbnail: Page 
744
    744
  • Thumbnail: Page 
745
    745
  • Thumbnail: Page 
746
    746
  • Thumbnail: Page 
747
    747