You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Behavioral and Demographic Responses of Túngara Frogs to Variation in Pond Density
David M. Marsh
Vol. 82, No. 5 (May, 2001), pp. 1283-1292
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2679989
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Ponds, Frogs, Metapopulation ecology, Animal nesting, Demography, Wetland ecology, Amphibians, Breeding, Foams, Conservation biology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Population responses to variable environments can result from individual behavior (i.e., dispersal and habitat selection) or demography (i.e., changes in birth and death rates). Distinguishing behavioral from demographic responses to environmental variability has important implications for interpretation of spatial patterns and projections of population persistence. I studied the behavioral and demographic responses of túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus, to experimental variation in the density of breeding ponds over two years. At natural spatiotemporal scales of variation in pond density, behavioral responses predominated over demographic responses. In the first year of the experiment, when plots varied in pond density, túngara frogs were proportionally more abundant in plots that contained higher densities of ponds. This behavioral response appeared to be due to increased ability to find plots with high pond densities and reduced effects of pond saturation (i.e., availability of unused ponds) within these plots. In the second year of the experiment, when plots had equal pond densities, there was a detectable demographic response to breeding-pond density early in the season, with fewer frogs in plots that had contained no ponds in the previous year. This response was short-lived, however, and by the end of the second year there was no detectable demographic effect. These results demonstrate that behavioral responses may predominate over demographic responses even on relatively large scales. Thus, studies demonstrating changes in patterns of abundance and distribution must be cautious in interpreting these results in the context of metapo-pulation dynamics without a detailed understanding of species-specific dispersal behavior.
Ecology © 2001 Wiley