You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Why Isn't Everyone a Bayesian?
The American Statistician
Vol. 40, No. 1 (Feb., 1986), pp. 1-5
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2683105
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Frequentism, Inference, Objectivity, Statistical estimation, Bayesian theories, Statistics, Decision theory, Mathematical problems, Probabilities, Decision trees
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Originally a talk delivered at a conference on Bayesian statistics, this article attempts to answer the following question: why is most scientific data analysis carried out in a non-Bayesian framework? The argument consists mainly of some practical examples of data analysis, in which the Bayesian approach is difficult but Fisherian/frequentist solutions are relatively easy. There is a brief discussion of objectivity in statistical analyses and of the difficulties of achieving objectivity within a Bayesian framework. The article ends with a list of practical advantages of Fisherian/frequentist methods, which so far seem to have outweighed the philosophical superiority of Bayesianism.
The American Statistician © 1986 American Statistical Association