You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Concepts of Relative Importance in Recent Scientific Literature
William Kruskal and Ruth Majors
The American Statistician
Vol. 43, No. 1 (Feb., 1989), pp. 2-6
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2685157
Page Count: 5
Preview not available
How is the ambiguous concept of relative importance for independent variables handled in the scientific literature? We sampled from a population of recent papers with relative importance (or the equivalent) in their titles. We found widespread apparent desire to make relative-importance statements, but little self-conscious interest in interpretation or in looking at more than one specification of the concept. We were unhappy to find that a substantial fraction (one-fifth) of the papers used statistical significance to measure relative importance.
The American Statistician © 1989 American Statistical Association