You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap Between Confidence Intervals
Nathaniel Schenker and Jane F. Gentleman
The American Statistician
Vol. 55, No. 3 (Aug., 2001), pp. 182-186
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2685796
Page Count: 5
Preview not available
To judge whether the difference between two point estimates is statistically significant, data analysts often examine the overlap between the two associated confidence intervals. We compare this technique to the standard method of testing significance under the common assumptions of consistency, asymptotic normality, and asymptotic independence of the estimates. Rejection of the null hypothesis by the method of examining overlap implies rejection by the standard method, whereas failure to reject by the method of examining overlap does not imply failure to reject by the standard method. As a consequence, the method of examining overlap is more conservative (i.e., rejects the null hypothesis less often) than the standard method when the null hypothesis is true, and it mistakenly fails to reject the null hypothesis more frequently than does the standard method when the null hypothesis is false. Although the method of examining overlap is simple and especially convenient when lists or graphs of confidence intervals have been presented, we conclude that it should not be used for formal significance testing unless the data analyst is aware of its deficiencies and unless the information needed to carry out a more appropriate procedure is unavailable.
The American Statistician © 2001 American Statistical Association