You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Legitimation and the Classification of Archaeological Sites
Mark P. Leone and Parker B. Potter, Jr.
Vol. 57, No. 1 (Jan., 1992), pp. 137-145
Published by: Society for American Archaeology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694840
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Archaeological paradigms, Archaeological sites, Archaeology, Spoken communication, Archaeological conservation, Positivism, Critical theory, Cultural resource management, Historical archaeology, Speech acts
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A good deal of archaeology is conducted within the context of historic preservation, which means that many American archaeologists are faced with the issue of determining site significance. In this essay, we turn to critical theory as a way of complementing the positivist basis for determining site significance. Among the critical theorists, Jurgen Habermas offers a way of examining and understanding a connection between knowledge about the past and the interests of contemporary Americans.
American Antiquity © 1992 Society for American Archaeology