You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Does Training Generally Work? The Returns to In-Company Training
Alan Barrett and Philip J. O'Connell
Vol. 54, No. 3 (Apr., 2001), pp. 647-662
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2695995
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Job training, Productivity, Employment, Business structures, Financial investments, Industrial training, Productivity growth, Statistical significance, Training, Human capital
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Using data from surveys of enterprises in Ireland in 1993 and 1996-97, the authors estimate the productivity effects of general training, specific training, and all types of training combined. Statistically significant positive effects on productivity are found both for all training and for general training, but not for specific training. The positive effect of general training remains when the researchers control for factors such as changes in work organization, corporate re-structuring, firm size, and the initial level of human capital in the enterprise. The impact of general training varies positively with the level of capital investment.
ILR Review © 2001 Sage Publications, Inc.