You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
United Nations Intervention and Recurring Conflict
Paul F. Diehl, Jennifer Reifschneider and Paul R. Hensel
Vol. 50, No. 4 (Autumn, 1996), pp. 683-700
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2704242
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: International cooperation, Conflict resolution, Violence, Peacetime, Armed forces, Dyadic relations, Armed conflict, International organizations, Economic sanctions, War
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The end of the cold war has signaled a dramatic increase in the number and forms of United Nations (UN) intervention into ongoing conflicts. Yet, this larger UN role has not always translated into success. Short-term failures are evident, but the long-term effects of UN efforts are not readily apparent. We explore this longer-term impact by examining the incidence of recurring conflict between state dyads following a crisis. Overall, UN intervention has proved ineffective in inhibiting, delaying, or lessening the severity of future conflicts, independent of the level of violence in the precipitating crisis, the relative capabilities of the two states, the states' history of conflict, and the form of crisis outcome; nor were UN efforts successful in deterring future conflict. These sobering results suggest that changes in long-term strategy may be in order.
International Organization © 1996 International Organization Foundation