You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Reinterpreting the Gender Gap
The Public Opinion Quarterly
Vol. 50, No. 3 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 316-330
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2748721
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Men, Voting, Political parties, Political partisanship, Public opinion, Polls, Liberalism, Political elections, Conservatism, Voting behavior
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This study offers an analysis of the recent political differences between women and men that contradicts the conventional description of the "gender gap" in American politics. Beginning with the 1980 elections, the differences between women and men in their opinions on political issues, in voting behavior, and in partisan identification frequently have been portrayed as a result of women's rejection of Reagan and of Republicans and conservative values and their attraction to more liberal political positions and to the Democratic party. This description is misleading and cannot explain the full spectrum of political behavior by the sexes in the 1980s. This analysis argues that the gender gap has been the result of unequal rates of defection by men and women away from liberal values and the Democratic party. Greater movement by men toward conservative position and the Republican party produced the gender gap. Consequently, the Republicans were never the potential victims but have always been the potential and actual beneficiaries of the gender gap.
The Public Opinion Quarterly © 1986 American Association for Public Opinion Research