You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Effects of a Prepaid Nonmonetary Incentive on Response Rates and Response Quality in a Face-to-Face Survey
Diane K. Willimack, Howard Schuman, Beth-Ellen Pennell and James M. Lepkowski
The Public Opinion Quarterly
Vol. 59, No. 1 (Spring, 1995), pp. 78-92
Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2749651
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Response rates, Denial, Opinion polls, Public opinion, Group incentives, Financial incentives, Marketing, Questionnaires, Suburbs, Educational incentives
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
We conducted a randomized experiment on a face-to-face interview survey in order to test the effects on response rates of a prepaid nonmonetary incentive. Results showed a statistically significant increase in response rates, mostly through reduction in refusal rates, in the half sample that received the incentive (a gift-type ballpoint pen) as compared with a no incentive control group. The effect appears to be due to greater cooperation from incentive control group. The effect appears to be due to greater cooperation from incentive recipients at the initial visit by an interviewer. Unexpectedly, the incentive group also showed a significantly higher rate of sample ineligibility, possibly due to easier identification of vacant residences of nonexistent addresses. In addition, evidence suggests greater response completeness among responding incentive recipients early in the interview, with no evidence of increased measurement error due to the incentive.
The Public Opinion Quarterly © 1995 American Association for Public Opinion Research