You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Differentiated Citizenship and Contextualized Morality
Eric J. Mitnick
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
Vol. 7, No. 2 (Apr., 2004), pp. 163-177
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27504307
Page Count: 15
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Jurisprudence, Disabled persons, Citizenship, Liberalism, Morality, Distributive justice, Universalism, Law schools, Moral principles, Cultural groups
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Political theorists, increasingly, are realizing the virtues of contextuality to conceptual analysis. Just as theory may provide useful standards for the assessment of political practices, so may application of theoretical constructs within particular contexts provide a critical corrective to theory. This essay relates work undertaken within sociolegal studies applying a constitutive methodology to such efforts to contextualize political theorizing. The essay describes how the emphasis placed by constitutive theory on locality and meaning entails a contextual analysis. The essay then demonstrates how a constitutive and contextual approach can enhance our understanding of the moral issues surrounding differentiated citizenship policy. While the most obvious cost associated with differentiated citizenship policy is a loss in formal equality, a contextual assessment demonstrates the prospect of an even deeper, though ultimately contingent, moral loss in self-invention.
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice © 2004 Springer