You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
"Situational Constitutionalism" and Presidential Power: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal Model of Presidential Government
J. Richard Piper
Presidential Studies Quarterly
Vol. 24, No. 3, Conduct of Foreign Policy (Summer, 1994), pp. 577-594
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27551285
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Liberalism, Conservatism, Presidential powers, Presidency, Constitutionalism, Executive branch, Liberal arts education, Public administration, Parliamentary system, Military diplomacy
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Assessing the liberal model of presidential government that prevailed from the late 1930s to the mid-1960s as an example of "situational constitutionalism," this study analyzes the four principal components of this normative model and the political situations which gave rise to their emergence and led to their demise. Examination of the post-1960s patterns illustrates the development of three new liberal presidential-congressional models, only one of which (though flawed) appears capable of serving the guiding and legitimating functions once performed by the liberal presidential government model. After surveying criticisms of liberal and other varieties of situational constitutionalism, and proposed alternatives, the study concludes that situational constitutionalism of the type analyzed has been a common and recurring feature of American politics and that proposals for overcoming it are unlikely to meet with success.
Presidential Studies Quarterly © 1994 Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress