Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:

login

Log in through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Journal Article

Effects of Varying Shade and Fertilizer on the Growth of Zamia floridana A. DC.

B. Dehgan, F. C. Almira, A. E. Dudeck and B. Schutzman
Botanical Review
Vol. 70, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 2004), pp. 79-85
Published by: Springer on behalf of New York Botanical Garden Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27571178
Page Count: 7
Were these topics helpful?
See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

Cancel
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Effects of Varying Shade and Fertilizer on the Growth of Zamia floridana A. DC.
Preview not available

Abstract

It has repeatedly been noted that ready availability of well-grown cycad specimens would substantially reduce collection of plants from their natural habitats. Although some cycads are extensively produced in several countries, there is uncertainty as to their optimal growing conditions and fertilizer requirements. Using Zamia floridana (sensu lato) as a model, one-year-old seedlings were grown in 30% and 50% light-exclusion shadehouses for one growing season. They were fertilized with roughly equivalent nutrient proportions of 20-20-20 (N-P-K) Peters solution at 300 ppm applied biweekly, nine-month 18-6-12 controlled-release Osmocote granules, and 16-8-12 Controlled Release Sierra Tablets plus minors at two and three tablets per container, and in combinations. There was interaction between shade and fertilizer types in all parameters measured. Overall, plants grown in 30% shade had a larger caudex, more leaves, and higher leaf and stem-plus-root fresh and dry weights. Peters fertilizer at 300 ppm was least effective in all growth parameters, as compared with other fertilizer treatments. Alone, however, it was more effective in caudex enlargement in 50% shade. No differences were observed between any treatments involving granules, irrespective of supplemental Peters. There was no significant difference between three tablets plus Peters and two tablets only, in 30% and 50% shade. Two tablets plus Peters and three tablets only, however, had a significant effect on caudex enlargement in 30% shade. In 50% shade, three tablets plus Peters or granules alone were more effective. These results and personal experience show that nearly all cycads grow best in ± 30% shade and benefit from fertilizers that contain micronutrients and a higher ammoniacal nitrogen source.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
79
    79
  • Thumbnail: Page 
80
    80
  • Thumbnail: Page 
81
    81
  • Thumbnail: Page 
82
    82
  • Thumbnail: Page 
83
    83
  • Thumbnail: Page 
84
    84
  • Thumbnail: Page 
85
    85