You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Selection toward Shorter Flowers by Butterflies Whose Probosces are Shorter than Floral Tubes
Daniel Bloch and Andreas Erhardt
Vol. 89, No. 9 (Sep., 2008), pp. 2453-2460
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27650784
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Pollen, Pollinators, Pollination, Species, Butterflies, Flowers, Proboscis, Phenotypic traits, Pollinating insects, Evolution
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Darwin's meticulous observations on the function of floral shape led to his famous prediction of a long-tongued pollinator, which he believed to be the evolutionary trigger for the long-spurred flowers of the Madagascar star orchid. Although tubular flowers are common, long tubes or spurs are an exception, suggesting that selection maintaining short flowers is widespread. Using the butterfly-pollinated carnation Dianthus carthusianorum and two butterfly species differing in proboscis length (Melanargia galathea and Inachis io) as model organisms, we experimentally demonstrate a reduction in pollinator efficiency with an increasing difference between proboscis length and floral tube length. Such a relationship is a prerequisite for the evolution of floral shape in response to pollinator morphology.
Ecology © 2008 Wiley