You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Baumann on the Monty Hall Problem and Single-Case Probabilities
Vol. 158, No. 1 (Sep., 2007), pp. 139-151
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27653579
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Games, Probabilities, Redaction, Statistical interpretations, Savants, Inference, Gusts, Statistical results, Kings, Mathematical problems
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Peter Baumann uses the Monty Hall game to demonstrate that probabilities cannot be meaningfully applied to individual games. Baumann draws from this first conclusion a second: in a single game, it is not necessarily rational to switch from the door that I have initially chosen to the door that Monty Hall did not open. After challenging Baumann's particular arguments for these conclusions, I argue that there is a deeper problem with his position: it rests on the false assumption that what justifies the switching strategy is its leading me to win a greater percentage of the time. In fact, what justifies the switching strategy is not any statistical result over the long run but rather the "causal structure" intrinsic to each individual game itself. Finally, I argue that an argument by Hilary Putnam will not help to save Baumann's second conclusion above.
Synthese © 2007 Springer