You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Synchronic Bayesian Updating and the Sleeping Beauty Problem: Reply to Pust
Vol. 160, No. 2 (Jan., 2008), pp. 155-159
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27653654
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Belief, Probabilities, Information relevance, Philosophy of science, Ambivalence
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
I maintain, in defending "thirdism," that Sleeping Beauty should do Bayesian updating after assigning the "preliminary probability" 1/4 to the statement S: "Today is Tuesday and the coin flip is heads." (This preliminary probability obtains relative to a specific proper subset I of her available information.) Pust objects that her preliminary probability for S is really zero, because she could not be in an epistemic situation in which S is true. I reply that the impossibility of being in such an epistemic situation is irrelevant, because relative to I, statement S nonetheless has degree of evidential support 1/4.
Synthese © 2008 Springer