You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Conceivability and Epistemic Possibility
M. Oreste Fiocco
Vol. 67, No. 3 (Nov., 2007), pp. 387-399
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27667940
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Epistemic possibility, Modal epistemology, Metaphysics, Relevant alternatives, Goldbachs conjecture, Phosphorus, Truth, Concept of being, Subjunctive possibilities, Reality
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The notion of conceivability has traditionally been regarded as crucial to an account of modal knowledge. Despite its importance to modal epistemology, there is no received explication of conceivability. In recent discussions, some have attempted to explicate the notion in terms of epistemic possibility. There are, however, two notions of epistemic possibility, a more familiar one and a novel one. I argue that these two notions are independent of one another. Both are irrelevant to an account of modal knowledge on the predominant view of modal reality. Only the novel notion is relevant and apt on the competing view of modal reality; but this latter view is problematic in light of compelling counterexamples. Insufficient care regarding the independent notions of epistemic possibility can lead to two problems: a gross problem of conflation and a more subtle problem of obscuring a crucial fact of modal epistemology. Either problem needlessly hampers efforts to develop an adequate account of modal knowledge. I conclude that the familiar notion of epistemic possibility (and the very term 'epistemic possibility') should be eschewed in the context of modal epistemology.
Erkenntnis (1975-) © 2007 Springer