You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Federal Use of Implied Guarantees: Some Preliminary Lessons from the Current Financial Distress
Public Administration Review
Vol. 69, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 2009), pp. 651-659
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27697911
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cost estimates, Federal budgets, United States federal budget, Government, Economic costs, Implicit costs, Housing, Credit risk, Financial securities, Mortgage loans
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
The U.S. financial crisis and recession that began in 2007 poses profound challenges for public policy and administration. It also provides useful information about the effects of economic policies. This paper considers the implications of current developments for the use of implied guarantees as an instrument for the use of implied guarantees as an instrument of public policy. It draws on experience with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to argue that implied federal guarantees have a severe disadvantage. Their costs are largely unmeasured, unrecognized in the budget, and unmanaged. Yet their use appears to be increasing in the current crisis. To minimize the costs of the expanded financial safety net, government should measure and manage those costs more effectively. To that end, this paper proposes new budgetary treatments of federal implied guarantees.
Public Administration Review © 2009 American Society for Public Administration