You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Ethics of Animal Experimentation [with Commentary]
W. Lane-Petter, T. W. Hegarty, A. N. Rowan, Richard D. Ryder and Stephen R. L. Clark
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vol. 2, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp. 118-126
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27715568
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Animals, Humans, Medical research, Research ethics, Animal experimentation, Home offices, Moral judgment, Species, Chemicals, Laboratory animals
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Animal experimentation arouses great emotion in many people, perhaps more especially in Britain, and this has increased as more sophisticated medical and non-medical animal experiments are demanded by modern research. The Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876 is the only legal regulation of experiments in animals, and many of its clauses are ambiguous. So in 1963 a committee of enquiry – the Littlewood Committee – was set up. Dr Lane-Petter examines the emotional and factual background to the enquiry, and discusses in an ethical context the usefulness and positive advantages of animal experiments compared with those of possible substitutes and in some detail three of the questions left unanswered by the Littlewood Committee.
Journal of Medical Ethics © 1976 BMJ