You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Ethical Reasoning in Mixed Nurse-Physician Groups
Søren Holm, Peter Gjersøe, Glenn Grode, Ole Hartling, Karen E. Ibsen and Henrik Marcussen
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vol. 22, No. 3 (Jun., 1996), pp. 168-173
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717759
Page Count: 6
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Objectives — To study the ethical reasoning of nurses and physicians, and to assess whether or not modified focus groups are a valuable tool for this purpose. Design — Discussion of cases in modified focus groups, each consisting of three physicians and three nurses. The discussion was taped and analysed by content analysis. Setting — Five departments of internal medicine at Danish hospitals. Sample — Seven discussion groups. Main measurements — Ethical content of statements, style of statements, time used by each participant. Results — Danish physicians and nurses do not differ in the kind of ethical reasoning they use, but physicians use more of the discussion time than nurses, they use a more assertive style of argumentation, and the solutions chosen are usually first put forward by physicians. Conclusion — The results and informal comparisons with similar data from long qualitative interviews indicate that groups of this kind are a useful tool for gathering data on ethical reasoning.
Journal of Medical Ethics © 1996 BMJ