You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Partial and Impartial Ethical Reasoning in Health Care Professionals
Helga Kuhse, Peter Singer, Maurice Rickard, Leslie Cannold and Jessica van Dyk
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vol. 23, No. 4 (Aug., 1997), pp. 226-232
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27717963
Page Count: 7
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Objectives – To determine the relationship between ethical reasoning and gender and occupation among a group of male and female nurses and doctors. Design – Partialist and impartialist forms of ethical reasoning were defined and singled out as being central to the difference between what is known as the "care" moral orientation (Gilligan) and the "justice" orientation (Kohlberg). A structured questionnaire based on four hypothetical moral dilemmas involving combinations of (health care) professional, non-professional, life-threatening and non-life-threatening situations, was piloted and then mailed to a randomly selected sample of doctors and nurses. Setting – 400 doctors from Victoria, and 200 doctors and 400 nurses from New South Wales. Results – 178 doctors and 122 nurses returned completed questionnaires. 115 doctors were male, 61 female; 50 nurses were male and 72 were female. It was hypothesised that there would be an association between feminine subjects and partialist reasoning and masculine subjects and impartialist reasoning. It was also hypothesised that nurses would adopt a partialist approach to reasoning and doctors an impartialist approach. No relationship between any of these variables was observed.
Journal of Medical Ethics © 1997 BMJ