Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Should Childhood Immunisation Be Compulsory?

P. Bradley
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vol. 25, No. 4 (Aug., 1999), pp. 330-334
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718331
Page Count: 5
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Should Childhood Immunisation Be Compulsory?
Preview not available

Abstract

Immunisation is offered to all age groups in the UK, but is mainly given to infants and school-age children. Such immunisation is not compulsory, in contrast to other countries, such as the United States. Levels of immunisation are generally very high in the UK,1 but the rates of immunisation vary with the public perception of the risk of side effects.2 This article discusses whether compulsory vaccination is acceptable by considering individual cases where parents have failed to give consent or have explicitly refused consent for their children to be immunised. In particular, the rights of: a parent to rear his/her child according to his/her own standards; the child to receive health care, and the community to be protected from vaccine-preventable infectious disease are considered. The conclusion of the article is that compulsory vaccination cannot, with very few exceptions, be justified in the UK, in view of the high levels of population immunity which currently exist.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[330]
    [330]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
331
    331
  • Thumbnail: Page 
332
    332
  • Thumbnail: Page 
333
    333
  • Thumbnail: Page 
334
    334