You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Disability, Gene Therapy and Eugenics: A Challenge to John Harris
Solveig Magnus Reindal
Journal of Medical Ethics
Vol. 26, No. 2 (Apr., 2000), pp. 89-94
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27718459
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Disabilities, Eugenics, Gene therapy, Embryos, Children, Embryo implantation, Genetics, Achondroplasia, Ableism, Medical practice
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
This article challenges the view of disability presented by Harris in his article, "Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?"1 It is argued that his definition of disability rests on an individual model of disability, where disability is regarded as a product of biological determinism or "personal tragedy" in the individual. Within disability theory this view is often called "the medical model" and it has been criticised for not being able to deal with the term "disability", but only with impairment. The individual model of disability presupposes a necessary causal link between a certain condition in the individual and disablement. The shortcomings of such a view of disability are stated and it is argued that in order to have an adequate ethical discourse on gene therapy perspectives from disability research need to be taken into consideration.
Journal of Medical Ethics © 2000 BMJ