You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
An Epidemiological Study of the Magnitude and Consequences of Work Related Violence: The Minnesota Nurses' Study
S. G. Gerberich, T. R. Church, P. M. McGovern, H. E. Hansen, N. M. Nachreiner, M. S. Geisser, A. D. Ryan, S. J. Mongin and G. D. Watt
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Vol. 61, No. 6 (Jun., 2004), pp. 495-503
Published by: BMJ
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27732271
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Violence, Assault, Nurses, Physical trauma, Registered nurses, Workplaces, Predisposing factors, Occupational health and safety, Psychiatric hospitals, Epidemiology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Aims: To identify the magnitude of and potential risk factors for violence within a major occupational population. Methods: Comprehensive surveys were sent to 6300 Minnesota licensed registered (RNs) and practical (LPNs) nurses to collect data on physical and non-physical violence for the prior 12 months. Re-weighting enabled adjustment for potential biases associated with non-response, accounting for unknown eligibility. Results: From the 78% responding, combined with non-response rate information, respective adjusted rates per 100 persons per year (95% CI) for physical and non-physical violence were 13.2 (12.2 to 14.3) and 38.8 (37.4 to 40.4); assault rates were increased, respectively, for LPNs versus RNs (16.4 and 12.0) and males versus females (19.4 and 12.9). Perpetrators of physical and non-physical events were patients/clients (97% and 67%, respectively). Consequences appeared greater for non-physical than physical violence. Multivariate modelling identified increased rates for both physical and non-physical violence for working: in a nursing home/long term care facility; in intensive care, psychiatric/behavioural or emergency departments; and with geriatric patients. Conclusions: Results show that non-fatal physical assault and non-physical forms of violence, and relevant consequences, are frequent among both RNs and LPNs; such violence is mostly perpetrated by patients or clients; and certain environmental factors appear to affect the risk of violence. This serves as the basis for further analytical studies that can enable the development of appropriate prevention and control efforts.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine © 2004 BMJ