You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Response to Hubert Dreyfus and Nancy Sherman
Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition
Vol. 144, No. 1, Selected Papers from the American Philosophical Association, Pacific Division, 2008 Meeting (May, 2009), pp. 81-93
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27734428
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Mutual intelligibility, Hope, Courage, Love, Marriage, Phenomena, Disasters, Cultural anthropology, Philosophical psychology, Restaurants
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
This paper tries to make clear what practical intelligibility is and how it is threatened at times of cultural breakdown or devastation. It argues that it is easy to overlook a breakdown in practical intelligibility because there is a tendency to frame the problems in terms of theoretical reason. Once one gets clear on what the threat to intelligibility is (and what it is not) one can see fairly straightforward ways to respond to the comments made by Dreyfus and Sherman.
Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition © 2009 Springer