You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
A Test of Three Models of Bias in Self-Assessment
L. Edward Wells and Paul D. Sweeney
Social Psychology Quarterly
Vol. 49, No. 1 (Mar., 1986), pp. 1-10
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786852
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Self esteem, Social psychology, Educational evaluation, Cognitive psychology, Psychological assessment, Mathematical dependent variables, Personality psychology, Academic achievement, Standard deviation, Regression coefficients
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
A Sample of 1508 high school boys from a national longitudinal survey of academic abilities and beliefs was used to test self-enhancement, self-consistency and stability-contingent theory. Respondents completed standardized ability tests, self-ratings of those abilities and measures of self-esteem and stability of self-esteem. Self-enhancement theory predicts that persons low, in contrast to high, in self-esteem will overrate their ability relative to the standardized measures in order to increase esteem. Self-consistency theory makes the opposite prediction: in order to avoid inconsistency and hence psychological uncertainty, people will make self-ratings that are compatible with their level of self-esteem. A third model, the stability-contingent hypothesis, was also tested. This model predicts that subjects with unstable self-esteem will show enhancement effects while those with stable levels of self-esteem will show consistency effects. Little support was found for either enhancement theory or the stability contingent hypothesis. Instead, self-consistency effects seem to be operating for all our dependent measures.
Social Psychology Quarterly © 1986 American Sociological Association