You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Seriousness of Social Dilemmas and the Provision of a Sanctioning System
Social Psychology Quarterly
Vol. 51, No. 1 (Mar., 1988), pp. 32-42
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2786982
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cooperation, Temptation, Social psychology, Experimentation, Social structures, Coefficients, Frustration, Net income, Personality psychology, Cultural customs
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Two types of cooperation can be distinguised in social dilemmas. Elementary cooperation occurs when members cooperate for the benefit of the collectivity. Instrumental cooperation occurs when members cooperate to introduce a change in the incentive structure (such as the provision of a sanctioning system) so as to eliminate the dilemma from the original situation. The results of a social dilemma experiment, using 48 same-sex four-person groups, indicate that (a) in the absence of a sanctioning system, greater temptation ot defect makes the subjects cooperate less fully, whereas (b) when opportunities to cooperate in a sanctioning system exist, greater temptation to defect in the original dilemma makes the subjects cooperative more fully for the provision or maintenance of the sanctioning system when the gain for cooperation is large. The implication of these findings is that as the social dilemma becomes more serious, people become more willing to cooperate in provinding a change in the system which addresses the dilemma problem.
Social Psychology Quarterly © 1988 American Sociological Association