You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
How a Structural Solution to a Real-World Social Dilemma Failed: A Field Experiment on the First Carpool Lane in Europe
Mark Van Vugt, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Ree M. Meertens and Jeffrey A. Joireman
Social Psychology Quarterly
Vol. 59, No. 4 (Dec., 1996), pp. 364-374
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2787077
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Carpooling, High occupancy vehicle lanes, Social psychology, Travel time, Commuters, Travel expenses, Commuting, Psychology, Automobiles, Questionnaires
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
In the current field experiment we evaluate a structural solution to a real-life social dilemma by examining the effects of a carpool priority lane on judgments and preferences concerning the decision to commute by caporpool (i.e., the presumed cooperative option) or driving alone (i.e., the presumed noncooperative option). Our general hypothesis was that this intervention would evoke a process of self-justification in solo drivers, arising from feelings of relative deprivation and/or cognitive dissonance. Cosistent with predictions, we found that in comparison with judgments made before the implementation of the carpool lane, solo drivers tended to decrease the importance of an attribute inherently linked to carpooling (i.e., low travel costs) and to increase the importance of an attribute inherently linked to driving alone (i.e., flexibility). Moreover, solo drivers exhibited a weaker preference for carpooling after the establishment of the carpool lane. This finding suggests that the negative side effects of this structural measure were pronounced than the intended carpool-promoting effects.
Social Psychology Quarterly © 1996 American Sociological Association