You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Arrowheads and Atlatl Darts: How the Stones Got the Shaft
David Hurst Thomas
Vol. 43, No. 3 (Jul., 1978), pp. 461-472
Published by: Society for American Archaeology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/279405
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Atlatls, Projectiles, Arrows, Diameters, Caves, Archaeology, Ethnography, Specimens, Discriminant analysis, Anthropological museums
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
An ethnographic and archaeological sample of 142 stone-tipped arrows and atlatl darts has been analyzed from several points of view. The raw data provide some quantitative measures against which unknown archaeological specimens can be compared. Several assumptions regarding projectile points are examined, and statistical analysis determines how much can be reasonably inferred about the entire artifact, given only the stone tip. Discriminant analysis further indicates how these 2 groups differ, and classification equations have been derived to classify unknown points as arrowheads or dart points. While separation is not perfect, the results indicate that arrowheads can be quantitatively distinguished from dart points with some degree of accuracy.
American Antiquity © 1978 Society for American Archaeology