You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Discriminating between climate observations in terms of their ability to improve an ensemble of climate predictions
Yi Huang, Stephen Leroy and Richard M. Goody
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Vol. 108, No. 26 (June 28, 2011), pp. 10405-10409
Published by: National Academy of Sciences
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27978626
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Climate models, Data types, Climate change, Surface temperature, Artificial satellites, Correlation coefficients, International environmental cooperation, Radiance, Clouds, Educational environment
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available
In view of the cost and complexity of climate-observing systems, it is a matter of concern to know which measurements, by satellite or in situ, can best improve the accuracy and precision of long-term ensembles of climate projections. We follow a statistical procedure to evaluate the relative capabilities of a wide variety of observable data types for improving the accuracy and precision of an ensemble of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) models. Thirty-two data types are evaluated for their potential for improving a 50-y surface air temperature trend prediction with data from earlier periods, with an emphasis on 20 y. Data types can be ordered in terms of their ability to increase the precision of a forecast. Results show that important conclusions can follow from this ordering. The small size of the IPCC model ensemble (20 members) creates uncertainties in these conclusions, which need to be substantiated with the larger ensembles expected in the future. But the larger issue of whether the methodology can provide useful answers is demonstrated.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America © 2011 National Academy of Sciences