You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
On Theory Development: Applications to the Study of Family Formation
Population and Development Review
Vol. 24, No. 1 (Mar., 1998), pp. 1-14
Published by: Population Council
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2808120
Page Count: 14
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The further opening up of demography to related social science disciplines is a felicitous outcome, provided that this does not lead to a segregated set of mono-paradigmatic approaches or explanations. Hence, we need to go beyond the anchored narrative approach. In the philosophy of science, several paths for such further theory integration are available, and the present essay makes use of two such approaches: Imre Lakatos's program of "progressive problem shifts" and L. Jonathan Cohen's "inductive knowledge of comparative reliability." An application is made to three theories of the so-called second demographic transition, by showing that (1) these theories are by no means mutually exclusive, (2) their mechanisms are often interrelated and synergistic, and (3) the plausibility of a theory may depend on a chosen subgroup or context in time or space. Given these properties, such partial theories or separate narratives are prime candidates for inclusion into a more overarching multiparadigmatic and multi-causal Theory.
Population and Development Review © 1998 Population Council