You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Systematics, Taxonomy, and Nomenclature of the Trematoda
Horace W. Stunkard
The Quarterly Review of Biology
Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sep., 1963), pp. 221-233
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2820128
Page Count: 13
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Recent publications present diverse opinions concerning the classification and taxonmy of the Trematoda. Dollfus (1958b) adopted the system of Faust and Tang (1936), recognizing three subclases: Monogenea, Digenea, and Aspidogastrea. Baer and Euzet (1961) removed the Monogenea from the Trematoda and regarded the group as a separate and independent class in the phylum Platyhelminthes, while Baer and Joyeux (1961) restricted the Trematoda to three subclases: Aspidogastrea, Digenea, and Didymozoidea. Stunkard (1962) presented a new arrangement and restored the terminology of Burmeister (1856) but revised the status of the Aspidobothrea. The class Trematoda was divided into two subclasses, Pectobothridia and Malacobothridia. The Pectobothridia contain two orders, Monopisthocotylea and Polyopisthocotylea; the Malacobothridia contain two orders, Aspidodothrea and Digenea. Morphological and development data are presented to support the opinion that the polystomes should be retained in the Trematoda; that the Didymozoidea should be included in the Digenea; and that the Aspidobothrea and Digenea should be included in a higher taxonomic unit, the Malacobothridia.
The Quarterly Review of Biology © 1963 The University of Chicago Press