You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Government Partisanship, Labor Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: A Corrigendum
Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan N. Katz, R. Michael Alvarez, Geoffrey Garrett and Peter Lange
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 87, No. 4 (Dec., 1993), pp. 943-948
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938825
Page Count: 5
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Standard error, Economic growth models, Political science, Correlations, Economic inflation, Least squares, Statistical estimation, Unemployment, Consistent estimators, Cohort studies
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Alvarez, Garrett and Lange (1991) used cross-national panel data on the Organization for Economic Coordination and Development nations to show that countries with left governments and encompassing labor movements enjoyed superior economic performance. Here we show that the standard errors reported in that article are incorrect. Reestimation of the model using ordinary least squares and robust standard errors upholds the major finding of Alvarez, Garrett and Lange, regarding the political and institutional causes of economic growth but leaves the findings for unemployment and inflation open to question. We show that the model used by Alvarez, Garrett and Lange, feasible generalized least squares, cannot produce standard errors when the number of countries analyzed exceeds the length of the time period under analysis. Also, we argue that ordinary least squares with robust standard errors is superior to feasible generalized least squares for typical cross-national panel studies.
The American Political Science Review © 1993 American Political Science Association